To Work or Not to Work

Economist Paul Krugman, who’s been pretty accurate in his predictions since the 2008 crash, wrote a column today weighing in on the benefits of extended unemployment payments.  There have been endless screeds on this subject, of course.  Predictably, conservatives are unequivocal in their conviction that people are not going back to work as soon as they might — especially in the service industries, but also to some extent in white-color jobs — because they’re lazy and fond of “living on the dole,” to use an old phrase.  The opposite view, espoused lukewarmly by Krugman, is that workers in leisure and hospitality can’t stomach the thought of returning to low-paying, thankless, drudgery jobs with no benefits; and those in offices are sick of slaving 70 hours a week and being paid for 40, with the requirement of being available 24/7, all the while being disrespected and treated as disposable.  Certainly, when it comes to corporate America, there’s a large degree of overlap between attitudes toward service and white-collar employees.  In other words, the bottom line is all, and anyone can be sacrificed to it.  Toxic conditions exist in burger joints as much as in cube farms. 

It’s no wonder, then, that servers and hotel staff who were laid off during the pandemic are having second, third, and fourth thoughts about going back to work.  Ditto admins, programmers, marketing people, and the like in office jobs, particularly those facing long, tedious commutes.  Anyone who actively dreads going in for a daily shift is going to put off doing so, if there’s a chance of something better anytime in the near future.  And rightly so.  With the minimum wage not only laughable, but stagnant for the last 12 years, while executive management rakes in the cash and perks, resentment is high.  Add in CEOs’ entitled mindsets, and Joe and Jane Average worker are at the point of, “Hell, no!” wherever possible.  I keep tabs on office job postings, and I’m seeing listings for skilled admin positions, requiring years of experience, with long lists of responsibilities, but no benefits, and salaries of $12 an hour.  The only people who are going to take those kinds of jobs are absolutely desperate, may not have the maturity needed, and will move on as soon as something even marginally better crosses the radar.  It would seem that the hiring companies don’t care about any of the above; getting a body in a chair is the objective.

I can completely relate to my fellow workers’ resentment and ambivalence toward returning to work.  I’ve been part of the leisure and hospitality industry, and it invariably translates to long hours of hard work, most often standing, carrying, serving, folding, scrubbing, lifting, or other combinations of physical exertion.  Pittance wages, dependence on tips, sometimes few or no benefits, hassles from customers.  Likewise, I’ve sat in the rarefied air of a corporate office, and have been required to take on seemingly endless piles of extra responsibilities, to learn new software and platforms, to complete work that only I (literally) could do, and have been celebrated as a real contributor to corporate success one week, and been out on my posterior the next week, after years of service and four-star reviews, due to “restructuring.”

I’ve had a couple bosses at the G.O.A.T. level, but not surprisingly, they were short-lived in their tenures, because either they couldn’t tolerate the things they were forced to do, or the corporation wouldn’t tolerate their sensible, compassionate, forward-looking approaches. 

Many other bosses were not so stellar.  There was one guy who was polite enough during the rare times I saw him, but who let me go one day, out of the blue.  His buddy later told me that my ex-boss’ wife had developed a truly deranged belief that there was an affair going on, and had told my former boss that either he got rid of me, or she’d leave him.  There I was, stuck on a resort island with the season over, no way to leave, no work to be had.  It was a scary couple months until a part-time restaurant job opened up.

Two hospitality bosses were habitual womanizers, and both of them hit on me.  I tactfully rebuffed their advances and suffered no negative consequences, luckily — there are always lots of fish in the sea at a hotel.  I just had to witness their carryings-on and pretend not to know about them.

Another boss expected me to cover for his liaison with a sales rep, and when I answered his wife’s calls and merely said I didn’t know where he was (the truth), instead of making up a lie, he was livid.  He assumed (incorrectly) that I was the one who told the COO about his shenanigans, so I was the recipient of a scathing, blistering (entirely fabricated) performance review, the only negative one of my career. 

I had a boss who was a really good guy, but who belonged in a corner with a calculator and a green eyeshade, rather than in a management position.  He’d grown up in Cleveland, but still had to call me from the road and ask directions to get across town [before phones with GPS].  He was lost when it came to his managers/associates and dealing with office situations, too.

Another guy was the absolute best in the office, but went off the rails and flashed a series of women in public before being hauled in by the police.  Needless to say, when I later recalled sitting in his office for one-on-one meetings, my thought was, “Ewwwwwwwwwww!”

And on and on.  I put up with all manner of BS, on all levels.  I willingly took on all the work they wanted to give me.  I worked around corporate cluelessness.  And still, I lost my last two jobs, along with other employees, because of the cutting-expenses mantra.  When I asked who was going to do my work, the answer in both cases was that the work simply wouldn’t be done anymore, the work that had been deemed so critical that I’d had to jump through hoops to master it.

Am I bitter?  Eh, once in awhile.  After all, I watched my job descriptions balloon exponentially, while my salaries only puffed up slightly.  And lost two good jobs due to short-sighted corporate groupthink.  Mostly, though, my philosophy is that if I had to leave a place, it was because I was meant to be somewhere else.  I realize, however, that I’ve been much more fortunate than millions of other people in this country, those who have truly horrendous working conditions, and who have lately been forced to reconsider their positions and realign their priorities.  They don’t want corporate serfdom and non-existent work/life balances.  They’re weighing their options.  And, as businesses are finding out, the result of all that deep thinking is, “Enough is enough!”  And it’s about time.

17 thoughts on “To Work or Not to Work

  1. Denise, the whole problem with the US nowadays is that working people are just not paid enough.
    When I immigrated to the US in 1974 people told me..”don’t worry about your pay, you will get paid oodles”.
    And I was.
    Sadly in the last 50-years that has all changed. Wages have not kept up with inflation.
    Compare the US minimum wage to the New Zealand minimum wage which is $22 per hour!
    American workers, even with both spouses working full time, are debt slaves.

    Like

    1. You speak the truth, sir. In spades.

      But every once in awhile, I read of a survey that says salaries aren’t everything, or even the biggest thing. People want recognition and respect, even it it’s only an occasional, “Good job!” When a worker knows that his or her company cares absolutely nothing about any employee, the incentive to stay there evaporates. If the money and healthcare are a case of necessity, that worker will be looking at job postings non-stop.

      Like

      1. ……salaries aren’t everything, or even the biggest thing….. but you have to be paid a living wage, If you work your butt off for 50-hrs per week and don’t get paid enough to pay your rent and buy your groceries – how demoralizing is that? And there are way too Americans in this boat. And without Universal healthcare.
        Denise, the house my wife and I bought in Seattle in 1994 for $198,000, that very same small three bedroom house, I just noticed on Zillow sold for $878,00. These young kids today are faced with being renters for their whole life.
        And as Andrew Yang warned, millions of retail workers, bank tellers, taxi drivers, travel agents, musicians, journalists, are seeing their livelihoods stolen by the internet.
        I hate to be a doom and gloomer but its a grim future for our grandkids Denise.

        Liked by 2 people

  2. No argument about the demoralizing aspect of not earning a living wage. Working your butt off and just barely covering the bills is agonizing.

    As for your house in Seattle, the exponential price increase is somewhat location-specific. I know that property values are rising overall, but for instance, in our neighborhood just outside Cleveland, values are stagnant at best. Because our little area hasn’t become gentrified, we’d be lucky to get the [low] price we paid for it, even with the complete rehab we’ve done.

    In any case, I’m reading that young people don’t see owning a home as a necessity anymore. They have a different attitude toward property in general.

    Sadly, Yang is right about the internet stealing jobs. Not sure musicians will fare as badly as some others, though.

    We don’t have grandkids, but we’re concerned about our 20-something nieces.

    Like

  3. Your blog this week Denise is “To Work or not Work”.
    Surely no discussion on this issue is complete without discussing Basic Universal Income.
    It has to happen.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. ABSOLUTELY AGREED! Have you by chance read “Ecotopia,” Dennis? I’ll just say that one of the premises is that everyone contributes to the society in some way, according to ability, and everyone is taken care of, all basic needs met. Yep, it’s a fantasy, but it does follow a logical structure.

      Like

  4. Around 1920, support for basic income started growing, primarily in England.

    Bertrand Russell (1872–1970) argued for a new social model that combined the advantages of socialism and anarchism, and that basic income should be a vital component in that new society.

    In his 1964 State of the Union address, Lyndon B. Johnson introduced legislation to fight the “war on poverty”. Johnson believed in expanding the federal government’s roles in education and health care as poverty reduction strategies. In this political climate the idea of a guaranteed income (UBI) for every American also took root. Notably, a document, signed by 1200 economists, called for a guaranteed income for every American. Six ambitious basic income experiments started up on the related concept of negative income tax. Succeeding President Richard Nixon explained its purpose as “to provide both a safety net for the poor and a financial incentive for welfare recipients to work.”

    Sadly the idea of a UBI in the US died on the vine.

    Liked by 1 person

  5. “UBI would actually cut some existing government costs, both for targeted welfare services that would become redundant, and even for prisons and police. Higher personal incomes available to spend on goods and services would also generate more tax revenues for the government. It is unclear how much would be added to the current intake, probably less than the net cost of the UBI. But the net deficit at the end of the day might be quite small or even non-existent.”

    Robert (Bob) Ayres is an Emeritus Professor of Economics and Political Science and Technology Management at INSEAD and the Novartis Chair in Management and the Environment, Emeritus. He is the author or co-author of 24 books and many journal articles.

    Liked by 1 person

  6. Job description ballooning? Check. Sexual harassment? Check. Low pay and no recognition for innovation? Check.
    Requirement and/or expectation of “covering” for an employer who is hiding out for whatever reason? Check. Being denied earned vacation time? Check. Being set up by a scheming assistant who was tired of not being promoted? Check. Not all of these occurred in every job. I used to tell myself that being made to feel uncomfortable was why it is called work.

    Liked by 1 person

    1. Yep, I’ve experienced every single one of those scenarios at one time or another, too, Daryl. And I’ll bet most other women—and some men—have, also. Makes ya just wanna rush back in there, right?

      Like

  7. Recently I saw where “Tesla Bots,” or humanoid robots, will rescue us from “dangerous, repetitive, boring tasks.” I wonder how much the robots will be paid — and when they’ll finally break and lead a revolt against The Man. 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply to Daryl M Davis Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: